AP BIO REVIEW: 4-24-03Cladistics,
Taxonomy, Plants, Photosynthesis
Implications of Cladistics
Understanding Branching Diagrams
The output from a phylogenetic analysis is a hypothesis of
relationship of different taxa. This hypothesis can be represented as a
cladogram, a branching diagram. Cladograms*
bear a lot in common with the notion of family trees. In a family tree
we trace back our ancestry. For example, in the family tree on the top
right, the ancestors of all the rest of the family are the initial black
dot and yellow square. These ancestors give rise to three children, one
of which mates and has two children. We can all trace our lineages back
to one set of ancestors. All
species have ancestors*
too. So, for example, sometime in the past an ancestral species (father)
of Homo sapiens walked the earth. This ancestor went extinct
(died), but left descendent species (children). In family trees, we can
talk coherently about real ancestors. In biology, the ancestors are
often gone sometimes without a trace. All we have left are the children.
Reading cladograms is much like reading a family tree. Both are rich in
information. Cladograms, like family trees, tell the pattern of ancestry
and descent. Unlike family trees, ancestors in cladistics ideally give
rise to only two descendent species. Also unlike family trees, new
species form from splitting of old species. In speciation, it does not
take two to tango. The formation of the two descendent species is called
a splitting event. The ancestor is usually assumed to "die"
after the splitting event. In
the first tree, labelled Cladogram A, notice the green dots. Each
dot has a letter associated with it. The dots with letters are the nodes
of the tree. The stems of the tree end with the taxa under
consideration, represented by boxes. At each node a splitting event
occurs. The node therefore represents the end of the ancestral taxon and
the stems the species that split from the ancestor. The two taxa that
split from the node are called sister
taxa*. They are called sister taxa because they are like the
siblings from the parent or ancestor. The sister taxa must each be more
closely related to one another than to any other group because they
share a close common ancestor. In the same way, you are most closely
related to your siblings than to anyone else since you share common
parents. Lets focus on Node C in Cladogram A. At the node,
the ancestor goes extinct but leaves two siblings hypothesized to be
humans and gorillas. Humans and gorillas are sister taxa and are more
closely related to one another than either is to chimpanzees or baboons.
Working
down the tree we come to node B. At this node the ancestor of the
humans and gorillas split from the chimpanzees. Therefore the
chimpanzees sister taxon is the human/gorilla ancestor. A sister taxon
can be an ancestor and all its descedents. We call an ancestor plus all
its descendents a clade. A cladogram shows us hypothesized clades*.
Finally
we come to node A. Here, we find the splitting event that led to
the baboons and the ancestor to the chimpanzees, humans and gorillas. By
working our way down the cladogram we have learned the pattern of
splitting. We have found out that chimpazees, humans and gorillas are
more closely related to each other than to baboons. In this example,
baboons are the outgroup*.
Now,
how in the world did we manufacture Cladogram A? We mentioned
that it was a hypothesis. What if it we chose another hypothesis like Cladogram
B or Cladogram C? We would change the pattern of speciation
events. In Cladogram B, humans and chimpanzees are sister taxa
and in Cladogram C, chimps and gorillas are sister taxa. Which
of the three cladograms presented above is correct? None of the
cladograms can be proved correct, but Cladogram B is the best
supported of the three based on character data and is therefore
hypothesized to best reflect the true branching pattern. Manufacturing
cladograms which show hypotheses of ancestry and descent requires that
we analyze characters and find those characters that unite clades. |
|
Continue your journey by selecting
one of the topics below.

Taxonomy
Taxonomy: System of
classification based upon similarities in structure.
Developed by:
Linnaeus , a Swedish botanist in the 18th century. Linneaus
used Latin names because they would not change over time.
Binomial
Names Genus + species
Ex: Musca + domestica "House Fly"The 5 Kingdoms: REALLY
6 NOW!!!
|
|
Name |
Structure |
Prokaryotic/ |
||
|
Monera
(BACTERIA)
|
Unicellular
|
Prokaryotic
|
||
|
Protista
(AMEBA)
|
Unicellular
|
Eukaryotic
|
||
|
Fungi
|
Multicellular
|
Eukaryotic
|
||
|
Heterotrophic....Ex:Mushrooms
|
||||
|
Plants
Autotrophic |
Multicellular
|
Eukaryotic
|
||
|
Many Plants
Perform Photosynthesis Within The Chloroplasts |
||||
|
Animals
Heterotrophic |
Multicellular
|
Eukaryotic
|
||
|
Heterotrophic |
||||
|
# 6
ARCHAEBACTERIA EX:
Cyanobacteria |
Unicellular |
Photosynthetic prokayotes |
||
|
Index
to this page |
These organisms
are microscopic prokaryotes.
When the first ones were discovered (in 1977), they were considered bacteria.
However, when their ribosomal RNA was sequenced, it became obvious that they
bore no close relationship to the bacteria and were, in fact, more closely
related to the eukaryotes (including ourselves!) For a time they were referred
to as archaebacteria, but now to emphasize their distinctness, we call them
Archaea.
They
have also been called Extremophiles in recognition of the extreme
environments in which they have been found:
Most
of the >250 named species that have been discovered so far have been placed
in two groups:
There are three
main groups:
These
are found living in such anaerobic environments as
They
are autotrophic;
using hydrogen as a source of electrons for reducing carbon dioxide to food
and giving off methane ("marsh gas", CH4) as a byproduct.
4H2 + CO2 -> CH4
+ 2H2O
Two
methanogens have had their complete genomes sequenced:
These
are found in extremely saline environments such as the Great Salt Lake in the
U.S. and the Dead Sea. They maintain osmotic balance with their surroundings
by building up the solute concentration within their cells.
As
their name suggests, these like it hot and acid (but not as hot some of the
Crenarchaeota!). They are found in such places as acidic sulfur springs (e.g.,
in Yellowstone National Park) and undersea vents ("smokers").
The
first members of this group to be discovered like it really hot and so are
called hyperthermophiles. One, Pyrolobus fumaris, lives at 113°C
(the boiling point of water at sea level is 100°C).
Many like it acid
as well as hot and live in acidic sulfur springs at a pH as low as 1 (the
equivalent of dilute sulfuric acid). These use hydrogen as a source of
electrons to reduce sulfur in order to get the energy they need to synthesize
their food (from CO2).
One
member of the group, Aeropyrum
pernix, has had its genome completely sequenced.
Other members of
this group seem to make up a large portion of the plankton in cool, marine
waters. As yet, none of these has been isolated and cultivated in the
laboratory.
The
archaea have a curious mix of traits characteristic of
The table
summarizes some of them.
|
Eukaryotic
Traits |
Bacterial
Traits |
|
Many traits found in the bacteria first appeared
in the ancestors of all the present-day groups. occurred
after their line had diverged from the archaea.
Their
have
suggested that the archaea may be the little-changed descendants of the first
forms of life on earth.
Because
they have enzymes that can function at high temperatures, considerable effort
is being made to exploit the archaea for commercial processes such as
providing
Archaea
may also be enlisted to aid in cleaning up contaminated sites, e.g., petroleum
spills.
17
May 2002
http://www.guilford.k12.ct.us/~faitschb/evolrev.html
Evolution
review:
natural selection - facts and assumptions
darwins missing evidence
Galapagos Is. significance
source of new genes in a population
signs of evolution (evidence)
fossils
homologous structures
analogous structures
hardy weinberg theory and conditions
h-w problems
gene frequency
types of selection:
diversifying
stabilizing
directional
radiant adaptation
isolation
sympatric and allopatric speciation
punctuated equilibrium vs gradualism
Lamarck's erroneous theory
genetic drift
bottleneck effect
founder effect
species definition
gene pool
heterozygotes (hybrids)
rev. 1/9/2002

At least 1.7
million species of living organisms have been discovered, and the list grows
longer every year (especially of insects in the tropical rain forest). How are
they to be classified?
Ideally,
classification should be based on homology; that is, shared
characteristics that have been inherited from a common ancestor. The more
recently two species have shared a common ancestor,
Until recent
decades, the study of homologies was limited to
However,
since the birth of molecular biology, homologies can now also be studied at
the level of
The figure shows
the bones in the forelimbs of three mammals: human, whale, and bat (obviously
not drawn to the same scale!). Although used for such different functions as
throwing, swimming, and flying, the same basic structural plan is evident in
them all. In each case, the bone shown in color is the radius.
Body
parts are considered homologous if they have
It seems unlikely
that a single pattern of bones represents the best possible structure to
accomplish the functions to which these forelimbs are put. However, if we
interpret the persistence of the basic pattern as evidence of inheritance from
a common ancestor, we see that the various modifications are adaptations of
the plan to the special needs of the organism. It tells us that evolution
is opportunistic, working with materials that have been handed down by
inheritance.
Embryonic
DevelopmentThe
embryonic development of all vertebrates shows remarkable similarities as you
can see from these drawings (supplied by Open Court Publishing Company). The
drawings in the top row are of the embryonic stage called the pharyngula.
At this stage ("I") they all contain a:
The branchial
grooves are matched on the inside by a series of paired gill pouches.
In fishes, the pouches and grooves eventually meet and form the gill slits,
which allow water to pass from the pharynx over the gills and out the body.
In the other
vertebrates shown here, the grooves and pouches disappear. In humans, the
chief trace of their existence is the eustachian
tube and auditory canal which (interrupted only by the eardrum) connect
the pharynx with the outside of the head.
The idea that
embryonic development repeats that of one's ancestors is called
recapitulation. It is often expressed as "ontogeny recapitulates
phylogeny"; that is, embryonic development (ontogeny) repeats phylogeny
(the genealogy of the species).
This is a
distortion of the truth. It implies, for example, that early in our embryonic
development we go through a fishlike stage. We do not. Rather, we pass through
some (not all) of the embryonic stages that our ancestors passed through.
Therefore, we find that the more distantly related two vertebrates are, the
shorter the period during which they pass through similar embryonic stages
(fish and human) and vice versa (fish and salamander).
We should also
keep in mind that embryonic development prior to the pharyngula (stage I)
may also be very different in the different groups. For example, while the
pharyngulas of the human and the salamander look quite similar, their earlier
development, starting with their fertilized eggs, are very different [illustration].
|
The
idea that "ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny" was proposed over
a century ago by the biologist Ernst Haeckel. He also made the drawings
on which the drawings above are based. Periodically, people rediscover
that in making them, he altered certain details to emphasize his theory.
Though they are schematic, the story they illustrate here has stood the
test of time. |
Protein
sequencing provides a tool for establishing homologies from which genealogies
can be constructed and phylogenetic
trees drawn.
Here are two
examples.
|
Human
beta chain |
0 |
|
Gorilla |
1 |
|
Gibbon |
2 |
|
Rhesus
monkey |
8 |
|
Dog |
15 |
|
Horse,
cow |
25 |
|
Mouse |
27 |
|
Gray
kangaroo |
38 |
|
Chicken |
45 |
|
Frog |
67 |
|
Lamprey |
125 |
|
Sea
slug (a mollusk) |
127 |
|
Soybean
(leghemoglobin) |
124 |
An
example of molecular homology.
The numbers
represent the number of amino acid differences between the beta chain of
humans and the hemoglobins of the other species. In general, the number is
inversely proportional to the closeness of kinship.
All
the values listed are for the beta chain except for the last three, in which
the distinction between alpha and beta chains does not occur.
The human beta
chain contains 146 amino acid residues, as do most of the others.
Cytochrome
c is part
of the respiratory chain down which electrons are passed to oxygen during
cellular respiration. [Discussion]
Cytochrome c is
found in the mitochondria of every aerobic eukaryote - animal, plant, and
protist. The amino acid sequences of many of these have been determined, and
comparing them shows that they are related.
Human cytochrome c
contains 104 amino acids, and 37 of these have been found at equivalent
positions in every cytochrome c that has been sequenced. We assume that each
of these molecules has descended from a precursor cytochrome in a primitive
microbe that existed over 2 billion years ago. In other words, these molecules
are homologous.
The first step in
comparing cytochrome c sequences is to align them to find the maximum number
of positions that have the same amino acid. Sometimes gaps are introduced to
maximize the number of identities in the alignment (none was needed in this
table). Gaps correct for insertions
and deletions that occurred during the evolution of the molecule.
This table shows
the N-terminal 22 amino acid residues of human cytochrome c with the
corresponding sequences from six other organisms aligned beneath. A dash
indicates that the amino acid is the same one found at that position in the
human molecule. All the vertebrate cytochromes (the first four) start with
glycine (Gly). The Drosophila, wheat, and yeast cytochromes have
several amino acids that precede the sequence shown here (indicated by
<<<). In every case, the heme group of the cytochrome is attached to
Cys-14. and Cys-17 (human numbering). In addition to the two Cys residues,
Gly-1, Gly-6, Phe-10, and His-18 are found at the equivalent positions in
every cytochrome c that has been sequenced.
|
Molecular
homology of cytochrome c |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
17 |
18 |
|
20 |
|
|
|
Human |
|
Gly |
Asp |
Val |
Glu |
Lys |
Gly |
Lys |
Lys |
Ile |
Phe |
Ile |
Met |
Lys |
Cys |
Ser |
Gln |
Cys |
His |
Thr |
Val |
Glu |
Lys |
|
Pig |
|
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Val |
Gln |
- |
- |
Ala |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Chicken |
|
- |
- |
Ile |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Val |
Gln |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Dogfish |
|
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Val |
- |
Val |
Gln |
- |
- |
Ala |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Asn |
|
Drosophila |
<<< |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Leu |
|
Val |
Gln |
Arg |
|
Ala |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Ala |
|
Wheat |
<<< |
- |
Asn |
Pro |
Asp |
Ala |
- |
Ala |
- |
- |
- |
Lys |
Thr |
- |
- |
Ala |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Asp |
Ala |
|
Yeast |
<<< |
- |
Ser |
Ala |
Lys |
- |
- |
Ala |
Thr |
Leu |
- |
Lys |
Thr |
Arg |
- |
Glu |
Leu |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
We assume that the
more identities there are between two molecules, the more recently they have
evolved from a common ancestral molecule and thus the closer the kinship of
their owners. Thus the cytochrome c of the rhesus monkey is identical to that
of humans except for one amino acid, whereas yeast cytochrome c differs from
that of humans at 44 positions. (There are no differences between the
cytochrome c of humans and that of chimpanzees.)

With such information, one can reconstruct an evolutionary history of the
molecule and thus of their respective owners. This requires
The result is a
phylogenetic tree. This one (the work of Walter M. Fitch and Emanuel
Margoliash) shows the relationship between 20 species of eukaryotes. The
numbers represent the minimum number of nucleotide substitutions in the gene
for cytochrome c needed to produce these 20 proteins from a series of
hypothetical ancestral genes at the various branching points (nodes).
The tree
corresponds quite well to what we have long believed to be the evolutionary
relationships among the vertebrates. But there are some anomalies. It
indicates, for example, that the primates (humans and monkeys) split off
before the split separating the kangaroo, a marsupial, from the other
placental mammals. This is certainly wrong. But sequence analysis of other
proteins can resolve such discrepancies.
Cytochrome c is an
ancient molecule, and it has evolved very slowly. Even after more than 2
billion years, one-third of its amino acids are unchanged. This conservatism
is a great help in working out the evolutionary relationships between
distantly-related creatures like fish and humans.
But what of humans
and the great apes? Their cytochrome c molecules are identical and can tell us
nothing about evolutionary relationships.
However, some
proteins have evolved much more rapidly than cytochrome c, and these can be
used to decipher recent evolutionary events. During blood
clotting, short peptides are cut from fibrinogen converting it into
insoluble fibrin. Once removed, these fibrinopeptides have no
further function. They have been pretty much free from the rigors of natural
selection and have, consequently, diverged rapidly during evolution. So they
provide data useful in sorting out the twigs of phylogenetic trees of mammals,
for example.
As we saw in the
comparison of human and kangaroo cytochrome c, a single molecule provides only
a narrow window for glimpsing evolutionary relationships.
The technique of
DNA-DNA hybridization provides a way of comparing the total genome of
two species. Let us examine the procedure as it might be used to assess the
evolutionary relationship of species B to species A:
As the figure
shows, the curve for A/B is to the left of A/A, i.e., duplexes
of A/B separated at a lower temperature than those of A/A. The
sequences of A/A are precisely complementary so all the hydrogen
bonds between complementary base pairs (A-T, C-G) must be broken in order
to separate the strands. But where the gene sequences in B differ from
those in A, no base pairing will have occurred and denaturation is
easier.
Thus DNA-DNA
hybridization provides genetic comparisons integrated over the entire genome.
Its use has cleared up several puzzling taxonomic relationships.
|
Link
to a phylogenetic tree of living hominoids based on DNA-DNA
hybridization. |
Another
way to compare entire genomes is to
The method is a
modification of fluorescence
in situ hybridization (FISH) and is also called Zoo-FISH.
Chromosome
painting has shown, for example, that large sections of human chromosome 6
(which includes hundreds of genes in the major
histocompatibility complex (MHC) have their counterpart; i.e.
homologous genes, in
Proteins
are the expression of genes so why not compare the actual gene sequences?
There are several advantages:

Some
of the most informative studies using comparative DNA sequencing have been
done with
In
both cases, the genes are present in multiple copies making their
isolation easier.
Ideally, a system
of classification should reflect the genealogies of the organisms. Darwin
realized this when he wrote: "our classifications will come, as far as
they can be so made, genealogies".
A classification
based strictly on the rule that all members of a group must have shared a
common ancestor more recently than they have with any species outside the
group is called cladistics.
This phylogenetic
tree or cladogram depicts the evolutionary relationships of 4
hypothetical species.
|
Taxonomists
who use cladistic methods have created an extraordinary vocabulary to
help them (not necessarily us). o
Ancestral traits are called plesiomorphic (shown here as black
numbers). o
Derived traits are called apomorphic (shown here as colored
numbers). All the members of a clade must share one or more apomorphic
traits not found in any other species. o
Derived traits shared by two or more species are called synapomorphic.
Here species A and B share the synapomorphic trait designated with a blue
3 . o
Ancestral traits shared by two or more species are called symplesiomorphic.
Here, the trait shown as black 1 is a symplesiomorphic trait retained by
all 4 species. |
Even
if we reconstruct a precise genealogy and draw a phylogenetic tree to
represent it, taxonomic problems may still remain.
1.
The species is the only taxonomic category that exists in nature. All
higher categories (e.g., genus, family, and order) are purely arbitrary. They
are created by taxonomists. For example,
o
Should
species C and D be placed in a single genus with A and B
in another?
o
Or are
all four sufficiently closely related that they belong in a single genus?
o
Or are
all four so distantly related that they should be placed in separate genera?
o
Note
that none of these options (and others besides) violates the fundamental rule
that all the members of any one group (or "clade") must have
had a common ancestor more recent than any they share with species in other
groups.
o

|
Those
taxonomists who are particularly impressed by the differences between
species tend to increase the number of higher categories. Those with
this bias are known fondly as "splitters". "Lumpers",
those taxonomists who marvel at the uniformities they see among species,
tend to create fewer higher categories. Thus, splitters might put each
of the 4 species in separate genera while lumpers would put them in a
single genus. |
2.
Classifications
based strictly on cladistics are too complex for convenience. In principle, a
separate category has to be created for all the branches derived from each
node of the tree. The box shows the conventional classification of Homo
sapiens (in the order Primates of the class Mammalia). Compare
it with the graphic above the box showing a classification of just the
primates based more closely on cladistics.
3.
A classification based strictly on evolutionary kinship (cladistics)
also may often seem to violate common sense. Thus a phylogenetic tree showing
the evolutionary history that gave rise to the salmon (a fish), the lungfish,
and the cow requires - according to cladistics - that the lungfish and cow be
placed in a clade separate from the salmon. Even though the lungfish is
a fish, the cow has shared a common ancestor with it more recently than its
common ancestor with the salmon. Although it is traditional to classify the
lungfish and the salmon together in the class Pisces (fishes), and to
assign the cow to the class Mammalia, this violates the rule of
cladistics. The lungfish and the cow with their apomorphic traits of
o
internal
nostrils and
o
epiglottis
are
descended from a common ancestor (red arrow) that is also the ancestor of all
land-living vertebrates (including ourselves!).
Even Darwin recognized that kinship alone was not always enough for a
sound taxonomy so he added a second criterion - degree of similarity - to be
used in assigning species to a taxonomic category.
1.
Deducing the evolutionary history of animals is particularly difficult
because all the 24 or more phyla of animals appeared within a short
time before and during the Cambrian
and have since evolved along separate lines. This means that all the branches
on the phylogenetic tree are long and bunched so closely at their base that it
is difficult to determine their relationships. More data would help, but
2.
Computer power. As more data become available, the ability of computer programs to sort
out the most likely tree becomes overwhelmed.
3.
Changing rate of evolution. There is considerable evidence that mutation rates
are not steady from branch to branch in phylogenetic trees. Thus a branch
based on molecules that have evolved rapidly would seem longer than otherwise.
4.
Back mutations. These mask the changes that preceded them and make branches look
shorter than they should be.
5.
Gene transfer between species. The recent availability of complete gene sequences
for many bacteria have revealed genes that appear to have passed from one
group to another rather than having been descended from a common ancestor.
Most of these "horizontal" transfers are between two different
species of bacteria, but the gene sequence of Mycobacterium
tuberculosis reveals 8 genes that it appears to have picked up from
its human host! So many of these have appeared that some microbial taxonomists
despair that a proper phylogenetic tree can ever be deduced for them.
6.
Convergent evolution.Evolution in which two species from different
genealogies come to resemble each other is called convergent evolution and
structures that resemble each other superficially (and may serve the same
function) are called analogous.

There are many examples of marsupial mammals in Australia which bear a
striking resemblance to placental mammals of Europe and North America. The
North American woodchuck or groundhog and the Australian wombat (photo
courtesy of the Australian News and Information Bureau), for examples, look
superficially to be close relatives. But their similarities are analogous, not
homologous, and have arisen as a result of similar selection pressures in
similar ecological niches. The wombat has no placenta, cares for its young in
a pouch as other marsupials do, and should be classified with them. In fact we
are more closely related to the North American woodchuck than the wombat is!
In the language of cladistics, the wombat is placed in a clade with all
marsupials because they share the marsupial pouch (an apomorphic trait) but
are nonetheless mammals because they, too, have hair (a plesiomorphic trait).
Convergent
evolution also occurs at the level of molecules.
Examples:
o
Cows
and langur monkeys both synthesize a lysozyme
that share the same activity, but comparison of their amino acid sequences
indicates that each has evolved from a different ancestral molecule.
o
Cows
and the bacterium Yersinia both synthesize a tyrosine phosphatase
with similar three-dimensional structures around their active site and similar
activity. However, each has evolved from a totally different ancestral
molecule.
o
The
bacterium Bacillus
subtilis synthesizes a serine
protease that acts just like those synthesized by mammals but not only has
an entirely different primary structure but its three-dimensional structure
(tertiary) structure is different as well.
Characteristics
of Birds Lab
The place in which a bird lives supplies the animal
with food. Using each of the birds mentioned, determine, as closely as
possible, the type of area in which they live. List these habitats ( places
where they live ) in the table at the end of the lab marked Habitat.
Answer the following questions completely based on what you know about birds.
1. What are some of the foods the birds in the pictures might eat?
2. Birds living near lakes, pond or the ocean are most likely to eat the
following organisms.
3. If you see birds walking around a lawn in front of your house, what types
of things could serve as a food supply for these birds?
4. Explain why dead or diseased trees can serve as a food source for some
birds.
Part 2
The beaks of birds have their job or function based on their shape. Look at
the pictures of the bird ( Click
Here ). Examine the beak of each bird and determine the type of
each beak based on its shape and function. Some beak types may be used more
than once. Place your choices on the chart in the column marked Beak for:
Beak types:
a). cracking type --- eats small seeds.
b). spear shape --- spearing fish
c). chisel shape --- drilling for insects
d). hooked --- catch prey
e). tubular --- to suck nectar
f). long and stout --- to scoop fish
g). short multipurpose --- can do many things.
h). crossed --- for chopping nuts.
Foot Adaptations:
Examine the pictures of each bird and determine the type of feet each bird
contains. Place the name of the bird on the line that best describes their
type of feet.
Also place the foot type on the chart in column 3 titled Feet for. Some
foot types may contain more than one bird. a). 2 toes in front and 2 behind
used for climbing.
b). 3 toes in front and 1 behind, long and used to walk in water.
c). 3 toes in front and 1 in back, used for swimming
d). 3 toes in front and 1 in back, contains long claws (talons).
e). 3 in front and 1 in back, used to sit on a branch.
f). 3 in front and 1 in the back, for walking on water.
g). 2 toes in the front, for running.
Summary:
1. Based on the talons found on an eagle, what type of beak would it contain?
2. A falcon looks like it has perching feet. What type of claws does it
contain based on the hooked beak?
3. Which bird contain the longest legs? What type of food do you think it
eats?
4. If you found a bird with climbing feet, what type of food would you expect
it to eat?
5. How many of the birds live near water? How can we tell?
Chart of Characteristics
|
Name
of Bird |
Habitat |
Beak
for |
Feet
for |
|
Woodpecker |
|
|
|
|
Quail
|
|
|
|
|
Pelican
|
|
|
|
|
Eagle
|
|
|
|
|
Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
Robin
|
|
|
|
|
Ostrich
|
|
|
|
|
Hummingbird
|
|
|
|
|
Heron
|
|
|
|
|
Whippoorwill
|
|
|
|
|
Jacana
|
|
|
|
|
Crossbill
|
|
|
|
|
Eras |
Periods |
Epochs |
Aquatic
Life |
Terrestrial
Life |
||
|
With
approximate starting dates in millions of years ago in parentheses. Geologic
features in green |
||||||
|
Cenozoic
(65) |
|
|
|
|
||
|
Quaternary
(1.8) |
Recent |
|
Humans
in the new world |
|||
|
Pleistocene |
Periodic glaciation |
First
humans |
||||
|
Continental drift continues |
||||||
|
Tertiary
(65) |
Pliocene |
All
modern groups present |
||||
|
Miocene |
Monkeys
and ancestors of apes |
|||||
|
Oligocene |
||||||
|
Eocene |
Adaptive
radiation of mammals |
|||||
|
Paleocene |
|
|||||
|
Mesozoic
(250) |
Cretaceous
(145) |
Still attached: N. America & N. Europe; Australia &
Antarctica |
|
|
||
|
|
Modern
bony fishes |
Extinction
of dinosaurs, pterosaurs |
|
|
||
|
|
Extinction
of ammonites, plesiosaurs, ichthyosaurs |
Rise
of woody angiosperms, snakes; first placental
mammals (Eutheria) |
|
|
||
|
Africa & S. America begin to drift apart |
|
|
||||
|
Jurassic
(205) |
|
Plesiosaurs,
ichthyosaurs abundant |
Dinosaurs
dominant; first angiosperms |
|
|
|
|
|
Ammonites
again abundant |
First
mammals;
Archaeopteryx; first lizards |
|
|
||
|
|
Skates,
rays, and bony fishes abundant |
Adaptive
radiation of dinosaurs; insects abundant |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
Pangaea splits into Laurasia and Gondwana |
|
|
|||
|
Triassic
(250) |
|
First
plesiosaurs, ichthyosaurs |
Adaptive
radiation of reptiles: |
|
|
|
|
|
Ammonites
abundant at first |
|
|
|||
|
|
Rise
of bony
fishes |
|
|
|||
|
Paleozoic
(543) |
Permian
(286) |
Appalachian Mts. formed; periodic glaciation and arid climate |
|
|
||
|
|
Extinction
of trilobites, placoderms |
Reptiles abundant: cotylosaurs, pelycosaurs. Cycads,
conifers,
ginkgos |
|
|
||
|
Pennsylvanian
(320) |
Warm, humid climate Together |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ammonites,
bony fishes |
First
reptiles |
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Mississippian
(360) |
Adaptive
radiation of sharks |
Forests
of lycopsids,
sphenopsids,
and seed ferns |
|
|
||
|
|
Periodic aridity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Devonian
(408) |
|
Placoderms,
cartilaginous
and bony
fishes. Ammonites, nautiloids |
Ferns,
lycopsids, and sphenopsids |
|
|
|
|
Extensive inland seas |
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
Adaptive
radiation of ostracoderms, eurypterids |
Arachnids
(scorpions) |
|
|
||
|
Silurian
(438) |
Mild climate; inland seas |
Nautiloids,
Pilina, other mollusks |
|
|
|
|
|
Ordovician
(490) |
Mild climate, inland seas |
Trilobites
abundant |
First
fungi
and bryophytes |
|
|
|
|
Cambrian
(543) |
|
First
eurypterids, crustaceans |
No
fossils of eukaryotes, but phylogenetic
trees suggest that lichens, mosses, perhaps even vascular plants
were present. |
|
|
|
|
Periodic glaciation |
|
|
||||
|
Proterozoic
(2500) |
|
|
Fossils
rare but many protistan and invertebrate
phyla toward the end |
No
fossils of eukaryotes, but phylogenetic
trees suggest that lichens, mosses, perhaps even vascular plants
were present towards the end. |
|
|
A
remarkable feature of the table above is how often evolutionary changes
coincided with geologic changes on the earth. But consider that changes in
geology (e.g., mountain formation or lowering of the sea level) cause changes
in climate, and together these alter the habitats available for life. Two
types of geologic change seem to have had especially dramatic effects on life:
A
body of evidence, both geological and biological, supports the conclusion that
200 million years ago, at the start of the Mesozoic era, all the
continents were attached to one another in a single land mass, which has been
named Pangaea.
This drawing of
Pangaea (adapted from data of R. S. Dietz and J. C. Holden) is based on a
computer-generated fit of the continents as they would look if the sea level
were lowered by 6000 feet.
During
the Triassic, Pangaea began to break up, first into two major land
masses:
The present
continents separated at intervals throughout the remainder of the Mesozoic and
through the Cenozoic, eventually reaching the positions they have today.
Let
us examine some of the evidence.
The
east coast of South America and the west coast of Africa and are strikingly
complementary. This is even more dramatic when one tries to fit the continents
together using the boundaries of the continental slopes (e.g., 6000 feet down)
rather than the shorelines.
The
Cretaceous period, the last period of the Mesozoic, marked the end of the Age
of Reptiles. It was followed by the Cenozoic era, the Age of Mammals. Although
extinctions have occurred throughout the history of life, an extraordinary
number of them occurred in a relatively brief period at the end of the
Cretaceous. Why?
Louis Alvarez, his
son Walter, and their colleagues proposed that a giant asteroid or comet
striking the earth some 65 million years ago caused the massive die-off at the
end of the Cretaceous. Presumably, the impact generated so much dust and gases
that skies were darkened all over the earth, photosynthesis declined, and
worldwide temperatures dropped. The outcome was that as many as 75% of all
species - including all dinosaurs - became extinct.
The key piece of
evidence for the Alvarez hypothesis was the finding of thin deposits of clay
containing the element iridium at the interface between the rocks of the
Cretaceous and those of the Tertiary period (called the K-T boundary after the
German word for Cretaceous). Iridium is a rare element on earth (although
often discharged from volcanos), but occurs in certain meteorites at
concentrations thousands of times greater than in the earth's crust.
After languishing
for many years, the Alvarez theory gained strong support from the discovery in
the 90s of the remains of a huge (180 km in diameter) crater in the Yucatan
Peninsula that dated to 65 million years ago.
The abundance of
sulfate-containing rock in the region suggests that the impact generated
enormous amounts of sulfur dioxide (SO2), which later returned to
earth as a bath of acid
rain.
A smaller crater
in Iowa, formed at the same time, many have contributed to the devastation.
Perhaps during this period the earth passed through a swarm of asteroids or a
comet and the repeated impacts made the earth uninhabitable for so many
creatures of the Mesozoic.
A mass-extinction of non-dinosaur reptiles occurred
earlier, at the end of the Triassic. It was followed by a great
expansion in the diversity of dinosaurs. The recent discovery of a layer
enriched in iridium in rocks formed at the boundary between the Triassic and
Jurassic suggests that impact from an asteroid or comet may have been
responsible then just as it was at the K-T boundary.
http://www.geo.ucalgary.ca/~macrae/Burgess_Shale/
The Burgess Shale is an exceptional Middle Cambrian
age (about 540 million years ago) fossil locality located in Yoho
National Park in the Rocky Mountains, near Field, British Columbia,
Canada. The locality is special because of the soft-bodied preservation of a
wide diversity of fossil invertebrate animals. The locality has been intensely
studied since its discovery in 1909 by Charles Walcott, and has been declared
a World Heritage Site. A popular introduction to the Burgess Shale can be
found in Steven J. Gould's book, "Wonderful
Life".
The
Burgess Shale occurs within the Stephen Formation in Burgess Pass on the
southwest side of the saddle between Mount Wapta and Mount Field. At the time
of deposition, this area was near the equator, and was the continental margin
of North America. A 100m high near-vertical cliff of limestone occurred at the
edge of the shelf. These rocks are known as the Cathedral Formation, and
probably represent the escarpment of a large submarine slump (i.e. landslide)
like those observed off the edge of carbonate platforms in areas like the
Bahamas and Honduras today. The Burgess Shale was deposited at the base of
this cliff, probably in anoxic conditions, as indicated by the lack of
bioturbation (burrows, trackways, etc.) and the abundance of pyrite (often
indicating the presence of H2S). All the organisms within the Burgess Shale
have been transported to this location, probably by small mudflows that flowed
over the edge of the cliff. This accounts for the variable orientation of the
fossils and their superb preservation.
There
are two quarries on Mt. Field/Mt. Wapta -- the lower Walcott Quarry and the
upper Raymond Quarry, the latter a few metres stratigraphically higher in the
Stephen Formation. The faunas in the two quarries are similar, but with
differences in the relative abundance of some of the organisms. Additional
localities with soft-bodied preservation, and further differences in the fauna
have been found on Mt. Stephen and further south.
The
illustrations presented here are from photographs taken in the Walcott and
Raymond quarries on September 24, 1995 during a hike guided by Glen DePaoli of
the Yoho-Burgess Shale
Research Foundation. No collecting is permitted in the quarries (or
anywhere in Yoho National Park), and all trips to the quarry must be guided.
See Burgess Shale
hike information for details. Although collecting is not an option, there
is plenty of material visible in the quarries, so a macro lens offers the
ability to bring back plenty of photographs. It would not take much to do
better than my results (I do not have great equipment and I did not even use a
tripod). If you try this yourself, you may want to experiment with wetting the
specimens or orienting them to reflect the sunlight.
These
pictures are copyright (c) 1995 by Andrew
MacRae, but are freely distributable for non-commercial use, provided you
give credit. Please contact me for
other arrangements. I have 24-bit versions of these images, if anyone wants
higher quality.
Looking
northwest -- 328Kbytes. Mount Wapta is the peak visible in the distance.
The escarpment in the Cathedral Formation is visible just a few metres beyond
the edge of the quarry on the left. It occurs at the contact between the white
dolomite and the grey slate/shale of the Stephen Formation. If you have access
to older photographs of the Walcott quarry, it is worth comparing them to this
photo -- the quarry has doubled in size as a result of continued work in the
last few years, mainly by Des Collins at the Royal Ontario Museum.
Bedding in
the Walcott quarry -- 144Kbytes. This photo shows details of the bedding
within the Burgess Shale. The bedding occurs a the scale of a few centimetres,
and consists mostly of graded beds. The yellowish bands are slightly
calcareous, while the darker grey bands are more pelitic (clayey). Both
lithologies are very fine grained (silt size grains or smaller). These
lithological differences are obvious only where the weathering of the face of
the quarry has altered the carbonate-rich beds. The graded beds represent
individual sediment-input events, possibly representing storms that disturbed
muddy sediment high on the escarpment, and caused it to rain down into the
deeper water at this location, burying and smothering organisms carried along
for the ride. The scale bar is 30 centimetres.
Anomalocaris
frontal appendage/claw -- 152Kbytes. This specimen is only a small part of
Anomalocaris, which was a large (up to 60cm or more) arthropod-like
predator. This claw was used to grasp prey. Walcott quarry.
Marrella
splendens is a small "arthropod" somewhat reminiscent of a
trilobite, but with several distinctive features. This illustration also shows
the dark "blob" produced by body contents which were squeezed out of
the animal after burial. Marrella is one of the most common fossils in
the Burgess Shale, and was probably the first soft-bodied organism noticed by
Walcott. Walcott quarry.
Marrella
splendens. The Burgess Shale fossils are preserved as
highly-compressed films on the surface of the rock, with some 3-dimensional
structure preserved. Some organic material is preserved on the surface, and
this produces a highly reflective surface. This Marrella example uses
reflected light, making the fossil look light-coloured against the dark
shale/slate background. Contrast this appearance with the previous example,
which uses diffuse light. Walcott quarry.
Olenoides
serratus. This is the largest of several species of trilobites found
in the Burgess Shale, some of which have been preserved with soft appendages.
This specimen is missing its left free cheek (on the head), but its skeleton
is otherwise complete, and I think one of the posterior antennae is present,
but it is not easily visible in the photograph. The orange colour is produced
by iron oxides. This specimen was wetted for the photograph. Walcott quarry.
Agnostid
trilobites are also common in the quarry, but none appear to have appendages
preserved.
Vauxia
gracilenta has a branching morphology, and is very common. Walcott
quarry.
Tuzoia
is a "bivalved" crustacean grossly similar to certain types of
modern brine shrimp. This photo shows only the carapace (the two shells), with
their distinctive reticulate surface ornamentation. In early interpretations,
the claw of Anomalocaris was reconstructed as the tail of Tuzoia!
Tuzoia is particulary common in the Raymond quarry, where this photo
was taken.
Ottoia,
showing muscle bands and gut. Ottoia is a priapulid worm found
commonly in the Burgess Shale. It was carnivorous, and probably lived in a
burrow like modern priapulids. This specimen has been wetted and oriented to
reflect the light, in order to show a delicate irridescent film which
preserves details of muscle bands, the gut, and even the small hooks at one
end of the worm (on the right -- unfortunately out of focus). Walcott quarry.
Ottoia
and Leanchoilia -- 424Kbytes. This specimen has two individuals of Ottoia
and portions of at least three individuals of Leanchoilia. The specimen
on the right has just the head, and shows the pair of peculiar appendages
found on Leanchoilia. The specimen on the left (with swimming
appendages directed upwards -- I am not sure if this is upside-down or not
:-)) is particularly interesting -- it has some dark-coloured sand-size
(shell?) fragments in a linear arrangement along the back of the animal. I
think these are gut contents. Cool! This specimen is from the Raymond quarry,
where Leanchoilia is particularly common.
|
Index
to this page |
The organisms we
call plants are assigned to a single clade;
that is, a natural grouping based on the belief that they have all evolved
from a common ancestor more recent than any shared with other organisms.
Among the criteria
for doing this are:
The ancestors of
these organisms were the most primitive members of the clade. In other words,
organisms that we would put in this division were probably the ancestors of
all the other plants.
There
are some 7000 species living today. They include:

Although some of
the multicellular forms are large, they never develop more than a few
differentiated types of cells and their fertilized eggs do not develop into an
embryo.
Green algae are an
important source of food for many aquatic animals. When lakes and ponds are
"fertilized" with phosphates and nitrates (e.g., from sewage and the
runoff from fertilized fields and lawns), green algae often form extensive
algal "blooms".
These are fairly
simple plants that do produce a number of differentiated cell types and whose
fertilized egg develops into a distinct embryo.
However,
they have neither
and
thus never grow very large.
Some 16,000 living
species are known. Most grow in moist places.
The
members of this group are often called club mosses. They are not mosses
at all, but vascular plants with xylem and phloem running
through their roots, stems, and leaves. The leaves are quite simple and small
with their vascular tissue in a single, unbranched vein.
The
"club" of their name comes from the appearance of their
spore-forming structures called strobili.
Club mosses are
also sometimes called "ground pines", but they are not pines either.
The photo shows Lycopodium obscurum.
About 1000 species
of lycopsids exist today. All are small (those in the photo stand about 8 in.
[20 cm] tall), but it was not always so. Fossil lycopsids in the Mississippian
and Pennsylvanian periods (the so-called Carboniferous
era) reached heights of 100 feet. Their remains contributed to the
formation of coal.
Chloroplasts
(as well as mitochondria) have their own genome.
The diagram (based
on the work of Ohyama, K. et al., Nature 322:572, 1986 and Linda A.
Raubeson and R. K. Jansen, Science 225:1697, 1992) shows the genome of
the first chloroplast DNA to be sequenced, that of the liverwort Marchantia
polymorpha. It contains 121,024 base pairs encoding 128 genes. The short
lines indicate a few of the tRNA genes, some of which are labeled.
The order of the
genes between the arrows (~6:30 to ~10:00) is also found in the lycopsids.
But in all other vascular plants, this region is inverted and
the order of the genes is precisely reversed. This provides further evidence
that the other vascular plants we shall examine below, the
belong
to a separate clade.
The common name
comes from the characteristic pattern of branching: whorls or rings of
branchlets arising from an aboveground shoot. The shoot develops each season
from an underground stem (rhizome).
Horsetails often
grow in sandy places and incorporate silica in their stems. This gives them an
abrasive quality which caused them to once be used for cleaning pots and pans,
which gave rise to another common name: scouring rush.
Only one genus of
sphenopsids, Equisetum, containing about 25 species, survives today (it
is placed in the division Equisetopsida). However, many other, much larger,
species were dominant features of the Carboniferous
and, like the early lycopsids, contributed to the formation of coal.
Approximately
9500 species of ferns live on earth today. Many of these are found in the
tropics where some - the "tree ferns" - may grow to heights of 40 ft
(13 m) or more. The ferns of temperate regions are smaller. They are usually
found in damp, shady locations. Their stems - called rhizomes - as well
as their roots grow underground and are perennial. Their leaves, called fronds,
grow up from the rhizome each spring.
Fossil
from the Devonian
period reveal fernlike plants that were heterosporus; that is,
produced two kinds of spores.
The megaspores
were not released from the parent sporophyte. Fertilization took place within
the tissue of the parent sporophyte thus freed from dependence on surface
water.
However, the
necessity for the microspores to be carried from one plant to another in order
to reach the female gametophyte robbed them of their value as agents of
dispersal. This function was taken over by seeds - dormant, protected,
embryo sporophytes.

The seed ferns,
as these plants are called, were among the earliest gymnosperms. Although seed
ferns are now extinct, some of their living descendants, the cycads,
resemble them closely. Cycads reveal their ancient lineage by the fact that
after the microspore reaches the ovule, it liberates a ciliated sperm which,
swimming in moisture supplied by the parent sporophyte, reaches the egg.
Ginkgos
are another group of gymnosperms that use motile sperm.
Conifers get their
name from the cones in which the both microspores and megaspores
develop.
The male cones
produce microspores that develop into pollen grains that are carried by
the wind to the female cones. Here each germinates into a pollen tube
which grows into the tissues of the female cone until it reaches the vicinity
of the egg. (In pines, this may take a year.) Then the tube ruptures and a sperm
nucleus fuses with the egg to form the zygote.
After
fertilization, the zygote develops into a tiny embryo sporophyte plant.

There are
approximately 550 species of living conifers. They include the
Conifers include
the largest and the oldest of all living organisms. One redwood (genus Sequoia)
growing in California is almost 400 feet high. Bristlecone pines growing in
the mountains of eastern California are more than 4000 years old.
Although most
conifers are evergreen, their leaves are modified as "needles", and
these reduce snow load and transpiration
during the winter in the harsh high-latitude climates where conifers are the
dominant species of plants. But by retaining their needles during the winter,
conifers are ready to begin photosynthesis immediately upon the return of
spring.
Coniferous forests
are of great economic importance producing lumber for building and pulp for
paper making.
Although
angiosperms appear in the fossil record in Jurassic
deposits, it was not until the end of the Mesozoic era that angiosperms became
the dominant plants of the landscape. That they dominate the earth's flora
today is clear: there are some 240,000 species of living angiosperms; the rest
of the plant kingdom includes only some 34,000 species.
Angiosperms
fall into more than a dozen clades, all but one of which are commonly called
dicots because their seeds have two cotyledons.
Dicot traits:
Monocot traits:
The
monocots belong to a single clade and share these traits:
Monocots
include:
Sexual
reproduction involves the two alternating processes of meiosis and fertilization.
Whatever
variation in details there may be from one organism to another, these two
activities must occur alternately if sexual reproduction is to continue.
In animals,
meiosis generates the haploid gametes - sperm and eggs - directly. These
single cells fuse to form the zygote
which will develop into another diploid animal.
In most plants
meiosis and fertilization divide the life of the organism into two distinct
phases or "generations".
Two
points revealed by plant life cycles:
In
fact, the gametophyte generation is the major stage in the life of mosses
and an independent plant in ferns.
|
Links
to descriptions of the gametophytes of mosses
and of ferns. |
However,
the gametophyte is only an inconspicuous structure in angiosperms and other
"higher" plants.
|
Index
to this page |
Angiosperms are
the flowering plants (today the most abundant and diverse plants on earth).
Most are
terrestrial and all lack locomotion. This poses several problems.
The functions of
the flower solve both of these problems.
In angiosperms, meiosis
in the sporophyte generation produces two kinds of spores.
|
Link
to a discussion of the alternation of gametophyte and sporophyte
generations |
|
Both types of
sporangia are formed in flowers.
In most
angiosperms, the flowers are perfect: each has both microsporangia and
megasporangia.
Some angiosperms
are imperfect, having either microsporangia or megasporangia but not
both.
Flowers
develop from flower buds. Each bud contains 4 concentric whorls of tissue.
From the outer to the inner, these develop into
|
Link
to a discussion of the genetic control of flower formation. |
|
Each stamen
consists of a
Meiosis of the
diploid microspore mother cells in the anther produces four haploid microspores.
Each of these develops into a two-celled pollen grain.
The two cells are
the
Carpels consist of
a
Often the entire
whorl of carpels is fused into a single pistil.
The megasporangia,
called ovules, develop within the ovary.
Meiosis of the
megaspore mother cell in each ovule produces 4 haploid cells:
|
Link
to a view of the entire process. Warnings: a large file (125K); you
will have to scroll through it; looks best on a light browser
background. |
The
nucleus of the megaspore undergoes 3 successive mitotic divisions. The 8
nuclei that result are distributed and partitioned off by cell walls to form
the embryo sac. This is the mature female gametophyte generation.
When a pollen
grain reaches the stigma, it germinates into a pollen tube. The
generative nucleus divides by mitosis forming 2 sperm nuclei. These,
along with the tube nucleus, migrate down the pollen tube as it grows through
the style and into the ovule chamber.
The pollen tube
with its contents makes up the mature male gametophyte generation.
The
pollen tube enters the ovule through the micropyle and ruptures.
Most
angiosperms have mechanisms by which they avoid self-fertilization. Link
to a discussion of these.

After
double fertilization, each ovule develops into a seed, which consists
of
The
food in the cotyledons is derived from the endosperm which, in turn, received
it from the parent sporophyte. In many angiosperms (e.g., beans), when the
seeds are mature, the endosperm has been totally consumed and its food
transferred to the cotyledons. In others (some dicots and all monocots), the
endosperm persists in the mature seed.
The seed is thus a
dormant embryo sporophyte with stored food and protective coats. Its two
functions are
Fruits
are a development of the ovary wall and sometimes other flower parts as
well. As seeds mature, they release the hormone auxin,
which stimulates the wall of the ovary to develop into the fruit. In fact,
commercial fruit growers may stimulate fruit development in nonpollinated
flowers by applying synthetic auxin to the flower.
Fruits promote the
dispersal of their content of seeds in a variety of ways.
Photosynthesis Review
1. light wavelengths:
a. which are used by PS
b. relative energy values of different colors
c. absorption spectra of chlorophyll
d. which color(s) is(are) reflected by green leaves
2. Chloroplast structure
a. thylakoid
b. stroma
3. The events in the light reactions, in chronological order
4. Water vapor from the air is split into H and O during Light reactions
5. Englemann's experiment
6. H2O is the source of hydrogen for the Calvin cycle
7. Resonant frequencies of the reaction centres in PS II and PSI
8. The chemioosmotic process which results in the synthesis of ATP
a. the source of energy to move protons
b. where the proton gradient is
c. where the ATP is synthesized
9. The differences between cyclic and noncyclic photophosphorylation
10. The reactant molecules needed for the Calvin cycle
11. The structure of the C3 and C4 leaves
a. stomata
b. function of bundle sheath cells in C3 and C4
12. The C4 pathway
13. The enzymes of the C3 and C4 pathways
14. The output of the Calvin Cycle is glyceraldehyde phosphate; this can be converted into fructose, dextrose, etc.
|
|
Photosynthesis-
2 steps
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Most photosynthesis occurs in the palisades mesophyll of the leaf where most chloroplasts are located. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
CHLOROPLAST..USED
FOR PHOTOSYNTHESIS IN EUKARYOTIC CELLS
|
|
MNEMONIC PAGE TAXONOMY
KEEP___________ KINGDOM
|